Back to Blog
Bootstrap builder vs coding5/11/2023 In fact, you're encouraged to pick and choose only the parts you need in the official documentation (shown below).Īs a result, the framework can be just as lightweight and effective at speeding up your site. However, you don’t have to download Bootstrap in full. It’s true that if you download each framework in full, W3.CSS is more lightweight and therefore faster. But such a seemingly unequivocal statement is misleading. In some discussion threads (like this one), you’ll see people comment that W3.CSS is faster than Bootstrap. Since page speed is a ranking factor for desktop and mobile searches, it’s important to evaluate the performance of W3.CSS and Bootstrap. That means that deciding between a framework that uses different programming languages is not only about ease of use - it’s about the load time of your site overall. This makes Bootstrap ideal for more advanced users with advanced needs.Ībove, we mentioned that HTML and CSS load faster than JavaScript in browsers. You’ll be able to, for example, create dropdowns, modals, popovers, and carousels for all slide behaviors, controls, and indicators - and more. However, if you invest the time in setting up and learning the Bootstrap framework, you’ll get more power than you’ll get with W3.CSS. If you go with the latter, the download process is different depending on if you choose the pre-compiled or source code version. Not only do you have to include a reference to the stylesheet, you also have to either load BootstrapCDN locally or download Bootstrap on your server. The process of loading the CSS files is still more complicated than W3.CSS. With Bootstrap, you can choose not to use its JavaScript library and simply not load the JavaScript files on your site. Second, to load the W3.CSS library on your site, you simply have to add a reference to the stylesheet in your index.html file. First, it is built only with HTML and CSS, which are easier to learn than other programming languages. W3.CSS is considered an easier framework to learn and use for a few reasons. Knowing that both W3.CSS and Bootstrap can be used as CSS-only frameworks (or at least for the most parts), let’s take a look at how they compare in terms of speed. So even if you do want to use Bootstrap’s JavaScript plugins, you’ll mostly only need to write HTML. Second, Bootstraps’ JavaScript API was designed to require a minimal amount of JavaScript. ![]() So you can use most of the Bootstrap framework without using JavaScript if you prefer. What does this mean for your Bootstrap site exactly? First, only certain components like dropdowns require Bootstrap’s JavaScript files to be loaded onto your site. ![]() ![]() Making buttons look inactive with the disabled attribute is one such example. HTML and CSS are also faster than JavaScript in browsers, and can trigger behaviors of common web elements that used to only be possible with JS. They do so for a few reasons: HTML and CSS are generally easier to learn and use for developers of all skill levels. In fact, the designers said they intentionally write HTML and CSS over JavaScript whenever possible. It’s important to note, however, that Bootstrap is primarily built with HTML and CSS. Bootstrap, on the other hand, uses HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. That means it only uses HTML and CSS - not JavaScript. W3.CSS vs Bootstrap: Programming LanguagesĪs mentioned above, W3.CSS is a pure CSS framework. Major differences are that W3.CSS is a less widely used framework that only uses CSS, while Bootstrap is a more widely used framework that uses CSS and JavaScript.īelow we’re going to take a closer look at these major differences and explore other critical ones. W3.CSS and Bootstrap are free, front-end development frameworks designed to help developers build websites faster and easier.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |